Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
8303 La Jolla Shores Drive subdivision appeal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 19, 2026.
Public comments (10)
Attorney for the Kavanaughs sought a continuance, then presented expert findings on drainage deficiencies and questioned the applicant's rights to use the private Calle Frescota roadway.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 2:59:00 →Represented the applicant, accepted staff's new conditions, and asked that the hearing proceed and the appeal be denied.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:02:34 →Adjacent property owner described homes built within feet of her house, lost views and privacy, and said the applicant had not acted in good faith.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:04:31 →La Jolla planning trustee argued the six near-identical large homes conflict with the La Jolla Shores design ordinance's unity-and-variety principle.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:10:02 →Raised technical concerns about unsequenced grading across six lots and stormwater discharge exceeding street capacity.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:12:00 →Questioned whether the architect has legal authority to act for the undisclosed owners of the six lots.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:14:12 →Appellant said the applicant bullied rather than engaged, plans kept changing, and asked for a continuance to review new conditions.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 2:45:38 →Project architect described six custom homes designed by owner-occupant families and asked the council to deny the appeal.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:40:49 →One of the six future homeowners; said the families are friends, not developers, and asked the council to let them build their homes.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:46:31 →Applicant's attorney argued the 1949 deed clearly grants utility rights and said the drainage comments came too late to justify delay.
Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:49:06 →