O
San Diego
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

8303 La Jolla Shores Drive appeal

San Diego

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (6)

At a glance

Public comments
10
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 19, 2026.

Public comments (10)

OpposedAnna LuedtkeMay 19, 2026

Attorney for the Kavanaughs sought a continuance, then presented expert findings on drainage deficiencies and questioned the applicant's rights to use the private Calle Frescota roadway.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 2:59:00 →
SupportiveChandra SlavinMay 19, 2026

Represented the applicant, accepted staff's new conditions, and asked that the hearing proceed and the appeal be denied.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:02:34 →
OpposedLynn SchenkMay 19, 2026

Adjacent property owner described homes built within feet of her house, lost views and privacy, and said the applicant had not acted in good faith.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:04:31 →
OpposedPhillip MertenMay 19, 2026

La Jolla planning trustee argued the six near-identical large homes conflict with the La Jolla Shores design ordinance's unity-and-variety principle.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:10:02 →
OpposedMo SammakMay 19, 2026

Raised technical concerns about unsequenced grading across six lots and stormwater discharge exceeding street capacity.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:12:00 →
OpposedBernard I. SegalMay 19, 2026

Questioned whether the architect has legal authority to act for the undisclosed owners of the six lots.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:14:12 →
OpposedArthur KavanaughMay 19, 2026

Appellant said the applicant bullied rather than engaged, plans kept changing, and asked for a continuance to review new conditions.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 2:45:38 →
SupportiveBrian WillMay 19, 2026

Project architect described six custom homes designed by owner-occupant families and asked the council to deny the appeal.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:40:49 →
SupportiveNatasha AlosMay 19, 2026

One of the six future homeowners; said the families are friends, not developers, and asked the council to let them build their homes.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:46:31 →
SupportiveLee AndelinMay 19, 2026

Applicant's attorney argued the 1949 deed clearly grants utility rights and said the drainage comments came too late to justify delay.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S505 - May 19, 2026 · 3:49:06 →