O
San Diego
← Community
Business JobsCommunity discussion

Ace Parking contract

San Diego

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 26, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedTheOriginalDraJan 26, 2026

Criticized paying a private company to run city parking while residents pay high rates, saying the city should offer free parking instead.

Monday Agenda Revised Added S400-S401 - Jan 26, 2026 · 1:11:32 →
NeutralBlair BeekmanJan 26, 2026

Asked about tram service coordination and parking rates around Balboa Park and urged affordable monthly passes.

Monday Agenda Revised Added S400-S401 - Jan 26, 2026 · 1:13:35 →
OpposedAndrea EbbingJan 26, 2026

Cited a 2024 audit finding contract lapses and criticized the long history of the Ace Parking relationship and the mayor's role.

Monday Agenda Revised Added S400-S401 - Jan 26, 2026 · 1:15:25 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentJan 26, 2026

Argued parking is a public need, not a luxury, and criticized rising fees, enforcement, and contracts that penalize drivers.

Monday Agenda Revised Added S400-S401 - Jan 26, 2026 · 1:17:31 →
OpposedBob KuczewskiJan 26, 2026

Called the contract length outrageous and asked that the contract guarantee customers can pay with cash at the parkade.

Monday Agenda Revised Added S400-S401 - Jan 26, 2026 · 1:20:07 →
OpposedKathleen LippittJan 26, 2026

Said Ace Parking rates are exorbitant and a 70-year relationship is suspect; urged cash payment acceptance and shorter contracts.

Monday Agenda Revised Added S400-S401 - Jan 26, 2026 · 1:42:59 →