Cannabis delivery ordinance

Opposed the ordinance, saying it creates a delivery monopoly that undermines the county's cannabis equity program.

Labor Council political director supported the ordinance, saying out-of-town delivery businesses dodge city taxes and harm local cannabis workers.

County social equity program manager said the ordinance attacks San Diego residents in the equity program and demanded the private right of action be cleaned up.

Called the law unnecessary and aimed at the social equity program; urged removing the private right of action and exempting in-county cities.

Former licensed delivery worker supported the measure, citing unfair competition from unlicensed operators.

UFCW delivery driver and grandpa of 63 said unlicensed operators dodge taxes that fund city services and union jobs.

Social equity applicant who did prison time for marijuana said the private right of action is a barrier to entry designed to keep equity applicants out.

Opposed the proposal as weaponizing private lawsuits against competitors and urged the council to reject it.

Former legislator told Campillo and Foster 'shame on you,' saying the private right of action is a loaded gun against historically disadvantaged communities.

Cannabis attorney said the permit is unworkable and unenforceable and the private right of action is duplicative of state law.

Americans for Safe Access board member urged rejection or removal of the private right of action and an exemption for county-licensed operators.

Asked for a full audit of the existing marijuana program's enforcement and tax collection before expanding regulation.

Changed his position from support to opposition over the excessive $20,000-per-day penalties and conflict with the equity program.