O
San Diego
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

IHRA definition (Item S500)

San Diego

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 17, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedDave LagsteinMar 17, 2026

Spoke personally as a Jew with family Holocaust history, urging a no vote and asking that the item be returned to the Human Relations Commission.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S507 - Mar 17, 2026 · 5:02:24 →
OpposedVicky EsteaMar 17, 2026

Urged a no vote, arguing the resolution protects the Israeli government's impunity rather than Jewish safety.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S507 - Mar 17, 2026 · 5:06:46 →
OpposedTaha HassaniMar 17, 2026

Described rising anti-Muslim incidents since October 2023 and urged a no vote, saying the measure is divisive rather than protective.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S507 - Mar 17, 2026 · 5:01:41 →
OpposedAkhil AlaminMar 17, 2026

African American and Muslim resident urged a no vote, arguing the definition is manufactured to promote a political ideology.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S507 - Mar 17, 2026 · 5:34:49 →
SupportiveIsrael B.Mar 17, 2026

Spoke in favor of adopting the IHRA definition, saying it helps clearly identify and address antisemitism.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S507 - Mar 17, 2026 · 5:35:55 →
OpposedTanya IbrahimMar 17, 2026

District 4 resident identifying as a Lebanese Semite urged a no vote, arguing the definition disregards non-Jewish Semitic peoples.

Tuesday Agenda Revised Added S500-S507 - Mar 17, 2026 · 6:13:07 →