Item 330 (opposed)

Vice president at Valet Living opposed fee restrictions on valet trash services, noting 128 local employees and describing the service as an optional amenity.

A small family landlord described decades of fair practices without charging the fees the ordinance would restrict.

Representing the Building Industry Association, opposed the ordinance as a threat to housing investment while supporting the transparency component.

A disabled veteran and small landlord said the ordinance penalizes mom-and-pop landlords and described insurance cancellations and a problem tenant.

A military family landlord of nearly 30 years said the ordinance ignores families renting out their homes during deployments and asked the council to oppose it.

Vice president of local public affairs for the California Apartment Association gave an extended opposition presentation on the 5% cap, screening report requirements, late fee grace period, and advertising rules.

For the Southern California Rental Housing Association, raised unanswered questions on screening fraud, the 5% caps, late fees, pet fees, and advertising scope.

Supported transparency but warned of fraud risks and said regulation is stifling housing development in San Diego.

For the Council of Infill Builders, warned price controls distort markets and strip flexibility from infill housing projects.

Objected to the 'price gouging' title as divisive, said trash/water/pet fees are not junk fees, and suggested legal aid funding instead.

For the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce, supported transparency but opposed provisions preventing cost recovery for operations.

A mom-and-pop landlord said pet fees are the only legal way to cover pet damage under AB 12 and opposed the screening report portability requirement.

Downtown San Diego Partnership VP urged a no vote, saying the ordinance adds regulatory uncertainty that discourages housing investment.