Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 20, 2026.
Public comments (3)
Thanked the council for the May 7 compromise on SB 79 and submitted written comments arguing the 48 additional bus stops should have been included in the SB 79 map, noting SB 79 is a transit-oriented development bill, not a general housing bill.
Special Agenda Revised Added 601 - May 20, 2026 · 16:19 →Argued the city should ignore SB 79 and keep its own zoning laws, citing a four-story ADU in Claremont, and claimed deportations would lower rents.
Special Agenda Revised Added 601 - May 20, 2026 · 17:36 →Supported phased implementation with exemptions outside a one-mile walk from transit stops, and urged scrutiny of the ministerial approval process under SB 79.
Special Agenda Revised Added 601 - May 20, 2026 · 38:10 →